DMV Practice LabAll tests

Minnesota Hazardous materials Practice 5

Selected knowledge practice, not a complete licensing course or practical training.

Minnesota Hazardous materials Practice 5

Practice mode
Question 1 of 16
  1. 1. A truck carries enough hazardous material to require placards. What minimum extinguisher rating must its power unit carry under 393.95(a)?
  2. 2. A fully charged extinguisher is secured behind cargo that must first be unloaded. Does this meet the required installation standard?
  3. 3. For winter operation, which extinguisher-agent condition is required by 393.95(a)?
  4. 4. An extinguisher has no pressure gauge but provides another way to visually determine whether it is fully charged. Is the missing gauge alone disqualifying?
  5. 5. A cargo tank used for Class 3 flammable liquids is empty. May the truck carry unlit fusees (flame-producing road flares)?
  6. 6. A commercial vehicle uses compressed gas as motor fuel but carries ordinary freight. May it carry fusees under 393.95(g)?
  7. 7. An old equipment checklist lists three liquid-burning emergency flares as an alternative to triangles. What changed in March 2026?
  8. 8. A checklist says federal 393.95(b) always requires spare electrical fuses unless circuit breakers are fitted. What changed in April 2026?
  9. 9. Hazardous cargo causes nearby residents to be evacuated for exactly one hour during transportation. Does this reach the public-evacuation NRC-notice threshold?
  10. 10. You must make an initial NRC report, but some cargo details are not yet known. What information belongs in the notice?
  11. 11. After exposure to hazardous cargo, a person is examined in an emergency room and released without admission. Does that alone meet the hospital-admission reporting criterion?
  12. 12. A collision kills someone, but the hazardous cargo remains intact and did not cause the death. Does the cargo's presence alone satisfy the hazmat-fatality NRC criterion?
  13. 13. Undeclared hazardous material is discovered during transportation, without leakage. Is a detailed incident report required?
  14. 14. A radioactive shipment's outer package breaks, but the inner receptacle remains intact. Does PHMSA require NRC notification?
  15. 15. At delivery, the driver stays and observes unloading when a reportable hazmat incident occurs. Who must file?
  16. 16. After delivery is complete and the carrier has left, the consignee unloads and spills material. Which reporting statement is correct?
Review all 16 questions with answers
  1. A truck carries enough hazardous material to require placards. What minimum extinguisher rating must its power unit carry under 393.95(a)?

    Correct answer: 10 B:C.

    The placarded-hazmat power unit needs an extinguisher rated at least 10 B:C. The lower non-placarded alternatives do not satisfy this requirement.

    Source: 49 CFR 393.95(a), October 1, 2025 edition, printed page 613; unaffected by the cited 2026 flare/fuse amendments; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  2. A fully charged extinguisher is secured behind cargo that must first be unloaded. Does this meet the required installation standard?

    Correct answer: No; it must also be readily accessible.

    Required equipment must be accessible as well as filled and secured. Preventing movement does not excuse burying the extinguisher behind freight.

    Source: 49 CFR 393.95(a), October 1, 2025 edition, printed page 613; unaffected by the cited 2026 flare/fuse amendments; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  3. For winter operation, which extinguisher-agent condition is required by 393.95(a)?

    Correct answer: It must not need protection from freezing.

    The required extinguishing agent must not need freezing protection. A correct capacity rating alone does not settle the cold-weather requirement.

    Source: 49 CFR 393.95(a), October 1, 2025 edition, printed page 613; unaffected by the cited 2026 flare/fuse amendments; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  4. An extinguisher has no pressure gauge but provides another way to visually determine whether it is fully charged. Is the missing gauge alone disqualifying?

    Correct answer: No; an acceptable alternative visual indication can qualify.

    FMCSA's guidance does not require a pressure gauge as the only visual charge indicator. This does not waive the other extinguisher requirements.

    Source: FMCSA 393.95 guidance question 1, effective May 4, 1997; visual indication of charge, not current rule text; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  5. A cargo tank used for Class 3 flammable liquids is empty. May the truck carry unlit fusees (flame-producing road flares)?

    Correct answer: No; the flame-device carriage ban also covers empty tanks.

    Under the amended rule, loaded and empty tanks used for Class 3 cargo are covered. The restriction concerns carrying flame devices, not just lighting them.

    Source: FMCSA final rule 2026-03261, 91 FR 7867, effective March 23, 2026; amended 393.95(f)–(g), printed page 7870, physical PDF page 4; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  6. A commercial vehicle uses compressed gas as motor fuel but carries ordinary freight. May it carry fusees under 393.95(g)?

    Correct answer: No; compressed-gas motor fuel also triggers the ban.

    The flame-device restriction includes compressed-gas-powered commercial vehicles. Ordinary freight does not remove that motor-fuel condition.

    Source: FMCSA final rule 2026-03261, 91 FR 7867, effective March 23, 2026; amended 393.95(f)–(g), printed page 7870, physical PDF page 4; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  7. An old equipment checklist lists three liquid-burning emergency flares as an alternative to triangles. What changed in March 2026?

    Correct answer: The liquid-burning-flare option was removed.

    Effective March 23, 2026, FMCSA removed that obsolete option. Follow the current warning-device requirements, including applicable flame-device restrictions.

    Source: FMCSA final rule 2026-03261, 91 FR 7867, effective March 23, 2026; amended 393.95(f)–(g), printed page 7870, physical PDF page 4; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  8. A checklist says federal 393.95(b) always requires spare electrical fuses unless circuit breakers are fitted. What changed in April 2026?

    Correct answer: The federal spare-fuse carriage requirement was removed.

    FMCSA removed paragraph (b) effective April 20, 2026. Carrying spare electrical fuses voluntarily is not prohibited; fusees are a different item.

    Source: FMCSA final rule 2026-03262, 91 FR 7877, effective April 20, 2026; removes and reserves 393.95(b), printed page 7880, physical PDF page 4; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  9. Hazardous cargo causes nearby residents to be evacuated for exactly one hour during transportation. Does this reach the public-evacuation NRC-notice threshold?

    Correct answer: Yes; one hour or more qualifies.

    The cited reporting guidance includes a public evacuation lasting one hour or more when directly caused by hazardous material. Exactly one hour meets that threshold.

    Source: PHMSA Guide for Preparing Hazardous Materials Incidents Reports, revised January 2004, still linked from PHMSA's September 7, 2023 FAQ; printed page 11, physical PDF page 13, 171.15(a)–(b). Dated guidance, not a verified 2026 rule edition; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  10. You must make an initial NRC report, but some cargo details are not yet known. What information belongs in the notice?

    Correct answer: Reporter/contact details, location, injuries and available material/hazard information.

    Provide the required incident and contact information, including available material details and continuing danger. Missing final findings do not justify delaying required notice.

    Source: PHMSA Guide for Preparing Hazardous Materials Incidents Reports, revised January 2004, still linked from PHMSA's September 7, 2023 FAQ; printed page 11, physical PDF page 13, 171.15(a)–(b). Dated guidance, not a verified 2026 rule edition; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  11. After exposure to hazardous cargo, a person is examined in an emergency room and released without admission. Does that alone meet the hospital-admission reporting criterion?

    Correct answer: No; treatment and release is not hospital admission.

    PHMSA distinguishes admission as a patient from treatment followed by release. Other reporting criteria may still apply; this is not a blanket exemption.

    Source: PHMSA interpretation 03-0028, May 21, 2003, questions 3–4; dated interpretation of fatality and hospital-admission criteria, not current regulation text; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  12. A collision kills someone, but the hazardous cargo remains intact and did not cause the death. Does the cargo's presence alone satisfy the hazmat-fatality NRC criterion?

    Correct answer: No; that criterion requires a death directly resulting from the hazardous material.

    PHMSA's interpretation requires the stated causal connection. Other accident-reporting duties or other hazardous-material triggers can still apply.

    Source: PHMSA interpretation 03-0028, May 21, 2003, questions 3–4; dated interpretation of fatality and hospital-admission criteria, not current regulation text; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  13. Undeclared hazardous material is discovered during transportation, without leakage. Is a detailed incident report required?

    Correct answer: Yes, discovery itself is reportable.

    PHMSA says discovery of undeclared hazardous material requires a detailed report even without discharge.

    Source: PHMSA Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting FAQ, updated September 7, 2023; questions 6–9 and 15, dated agency guidance; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  14. A radioactive shipment's outer package breaks, but the inner receptacle remains intact. Does PHMSA require NRC notification?

    Correct answer: Yes, despite the intact inner receptacle.

    PHMSA's FAQ treats this outer-package breakage as reportable without requiring a release or overexposure.

    Source: PHMSA Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting FAQ, updated September 7, 2023; questions 6–9 and 15, dated agency guidance; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  15. At delivery, the driver stays and observes unloading when a reportable hazmat incident occurs. Who must file?

    Correct answer: The carrier remains responsible.

    PHMSA includes unloading while the carrier participates or observes within transportation for this reporting duty.

    Source: PHMSA Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting FAQ, updated September 7, 2023; questions 6–9 and 15, dated agency guidance; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

  16. After delivery is complete and the carrier has left, the consignee unloads and spills material. Which reporting statement is correct?

    Correct answer: HMR transportation reporting need not apply; other laws may.

    PHMSA distinguishes unloading after transportation ends. Environmental and other reporting obligations can still apply.

    Source: PHMSA Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting FAQ, updated September 7, 2023; questions 6–9 and 15, dated agency guidance; reviewed September 21, 2026. ↗

Report a problem with this question

Question reference: mn-cdl-hazmat-065

Opens a draft in your email app. Review and send it there; nothing is sent automatically.

Draft a correction email

Contact details & help

Study tools & test information